Search News


Browse Archives

News

A Historic Union?

January 15, 2010

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

A month after completing its first foray into online higher education by acquiring the distance education provider Penn Foster, the Princeton Review has set its next goal: to help create the largest online college ever. And it thinks it can do it in five years.

The company announced yesterday that it is entering into a joint venture with the National Labor College -- an accredited institution that offers blended-learning programs to 200 students, most of whom are adults -- to establish what would be called the College for Working Families. The college would offer courses tailored to the needs of union members and their families, beginning this fall.

The curriculum would be broadened from the National Labor College’s current offerings, which are largely made up of courses in labor studies. “We always saw ourselves as the West Point of the labor movement, focusing on training labor leaders,” said William Scheuerman, president of the National Labor College.

The College for Working Families, on the other hand, would respond to the needs of the larger union population -- a large proportion of which wants practical training for new lines of work. The new institution would start off awarding associate degrees, with aspirations to running bachelor's and master's programs down the line. Tuition would be similar to that at most community colleges.

Now independent, the National Labor College was originally established as a training center for the AFL-CIO, with which it still retains a close relationship. That’s where the growth potential comes from; the AFL-CIO has 11.5 million members. And with back-office support from Penn Foster -- which currently enrolls 223,000 students in 150 countries through its online postsecondary, vocational, and high school programs — the College for Working Families is expected to grow on a historical scale.

“Anytime you take 11.5 million people and their families and say, 'We’re going to go to them and offer a reasonably wide range of educational options …' it’s certainly ambitious,” said Michael Perik, president and CEO of the Priceton Review, citing the high demand for inexpensive re-training programs.

“We see no reason why, over the next four to five years, this won’t become the category leader in postsecondary education,” Perik said.

Scheuerman said he was aware of the potential dangers of growing too large too quickly, and that the partners were currently working out how to manage growth and ensure quality in the face of huge demand.

Michael Goldstein, a lawyer at the Washington firm of Dow Lohnes, which is serving as special counsel to the National Labor College, said the marriage between the labor college and corporate online giant was indicative of the broader trend of for-profit institutions partnering with nonprofit colleges. (Update: An earlier version of this article incorrectly identified Goldstein as general counsel to the National Labor College.)

In an article scheduled to be published in an upcoming issue of the journal Trusteeship, Goldstein writes that partnering with nonprofit colleges is a great way for for-profit entities to sidestep the red tape and get their foot in the door of the lucrative online education industry. Meanwhile, the nonprofits, as long as they retain full control of the college’s academic operations, can benefit greatly from the administrative and marketing strengths of their for-profit partners.

In this instance, linking up with a college that expects to enroll massive numbers of a very particular sort of adult learner could connect the Princeton Review, through Penn Foster, to a niche demographic that it would not have otherwise been able to reach as effectively, said Richard Garrett, managing director of the higher ed consulting firm Eduventures. And the unions could never hope to build such a potentially massive re-training operation on their own, Garrett said.

“To me, that’s quite a good fit there,” he said.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on A Historic Union?

  • Labor College
  • Posted by Ellen Schrecker , Professor of History at Yeshiva University on January 15, 2010 at 9:15am EST
  • And who is going to be teaching at this new college? Will it be part-time adjuncts making about $2000 a course with no benefits? One hopes that Wm. Scheuerman who comes out of the higher education division of the AFT will have devoted some thought to the matter and will require that the internet folks provide their teachers with decent full-time jobs, perhaps even with some kind of tenure (though I, for one, am skeptical about the prospects of such an institution) and job security, as well as academic freedom.

  • More info is needed on the contingent labor force involved....
  • Posted by vfichera on January 15, 2010 at 9:30am EST
  • ...because, ironically, the National Labor College is overwhelmingly staffed by part-time faculty who organized into a union in the past few years.

    Is this new effort by the National Labor College a union-busting run-around against its own faculty?

    More reporting, please....

  • a sad day
  • Posted by Wade Hannon , Assoc. Prof./Counseling & Pres. of Chapter 42, AFT Local 4660 on January 15, 2010 at 10:30am EST
  • This is a sad day for the working class and a sad commentary on the state of organized labor & the institutions that allege to represent our interests.

  • NLC Faculty
  • Posted by Mike Goldstein , Practice Leader, Higher Education at Dow Lohnes on January 15, 2010 at 11:30am EST
  • In clarification (since this is an obviously important question), it will be the National Labor College, not the joint venture and not Penn Foster, that will offer the academic program, and the program will be exclusively taught by NLC faculty. There is no "outsourcing" of the core academic responsibilities of the College. As should come as no surprise, all of NLC's faculty are union members, and as also should not be a surprise, that is not expected to change.

  • aspiring to disappoint?
  • Posted by Dan Reyes at Nonstop Institute on January 15, 2010 at 11:45am EST
  •  Mergers and acquisitions to swiftly created colossal corporate interests have shown themselves to work quite well if what you are after is the disassembly of work force pride and security and the cheap production of third rate output.

  • to Mike Goldstein
  • Posted by Marian Capstar on January 15, 2010 at 12:30pm EST
  • The question was -- are the NLC faculty part-timers? What job security do they have? What benefits? What salary range? Your clarification did not clarify much.

  • Posted by Iveta Jusova at Nonstop Institute on January 15, 2010 at 1:45pm EST
  •  I am concerned that the recent reporting in Insider Higher Ed focusing on the concessions that US college and university faculty have been forced to make in recent years might in the end reinforce the forces working towards the corporatization of US higher ed by (mis)representing it as inevitable. Reading about one concession after another might inadvertently produce the same effect on the collective faculty mentality that the Chicago School of Economics’ shock doctrine, analyzed so eloquently by Naomi Klein, has had on the public around the world. I challenge Inside Higher Ed to look harder for stories of faculty success in reversing the tide of higher-ed corporatization. Looking into the activities and thinking of such groups and collectives as the MLA Radical Caucus or the Edu-Factory Collective might be a start. As numerous thinkers in the field of higher ed have argued, the trend towards a market reorganization of colleges and universities is not inevitable and is reversible.

  • National Labor College
  • Posted by Ross Borden , lecturer in English at SUNY Cortland on January 16, 2010 at 12:15pm EST
  • Here is what I can find online so far. I’d be glad to stand corrected.

    On its website the National Labor College posts the number of its full-time faculty (15) but not of its “adjunct faculty,” “full-staff staff,” or “part-time staff.” As usual elsewhere, these are noted as distinct groups but not counted individually.

    The website of the Washington-Baltimore News Guild reports that as of 2006, “Approximately 20 NLC archivists, librarians and instructors are protected by a contract that is bargained and enforced by the Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild.” (http://www.wbng.org/gmc/)

    The 2009-2011 contract is at http://www.wbng.org/contracts/nlc2005-09.pdf. It states,

    "1.2. Part-time Employees
    The wages and vacation and compensatory time benefits of any Instructional Faculty member with less than a full work load shall be apportioned or prorated in a separate written memorandum between the Faculty member, the Guild and the College."

    Ditto for Non-Instructional Faculty. While part-time employees are members of the bargaining unit, it appears they must negotiate individually and without minimum provisions in the contract itself. So far, I can’t find the separate memoranda posted online.

    Here is the article on “Adjunct Instructors”:

    "1.8. Adjunct Instructors
    a. Adjuncts will not be used when the intent or effect is to displace unit Faculty members or reduce the actual number of permanent bargaining unit Faculty positions.
    b. All adjunct instructors shall be excluded from the Guild bargaining unit and from coverage under this Agreement. The College and the Guild agree that their exclusion during this contract term does not preclude coverage of adjuncts in this contract’s
    successor Agreement.
    c. The College is committed to creating a permanent, full-time Faculty for the BTPS program. Provided performance meets standards of professional excellence established by the Faculty, the College agrees to provide BTPS adjuncts with regular employment where economically and practically feasible and the first opportunity to be considered for permanent positions in the BTPS program as they are created."

    According to the NLC website, “The Bachelor of Technical and Professional Studies (BTPS) is a totally online degree.”

    Ross.Borden@NewFacultyMajority.org

  • Partnership outcomes
  • Posted by Vanessa Vaile , Migrant (Knowledge) Worker (retired) at Groves of Academe on January 16, 2010 at 5:45pm EST
  • Which parent will the offspring most resemble?

    Despite claims of the National Labor College retaining "full control of the college’s academic operations," Michael Goldstein's comment, "partnering with nonprofit colleges is a great way for for-profit entities to sidestep the red tape and get their foot in the door of the lucrative online education industry," tells us all we need to know about future employment practices and education policies.

  • double dangers?
  • Posted by hoppingmadjunct , Lecturer (since 1994) at SUNY on January 16, 2010 at 10:45pm EST
  • NLC's President Bill Scheuermann, appointed by pre-outed Governor Eliot Spitzer to NYS's Higher Education Commission, told that body that the single greatest danger to public higher education was the lack of full-time faculty. No doubt that's partly because of provisions like the stipulation in NLC's own contract: "All adjunct instructors shall be excluded from the Guild bargaining unit and from coverage under this Agreement. ..." (1.8.b). But the ambitious new College for Working Families might well need to employ more part-time faculty than the NLC's present 15-20 full timers. Not to worry: no doubt they'll fare better under Penn Foster than SUNY adjuncts ever did under the impassioned but duplicitous "brotherhood" rhetoric of Mr. Scheuermann.