Search News


Browse Archives

News

Degree Completion for Dog Lovers

June 19, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

It's not spelled out as an admissions requirement, but it’s a safe assumption that “Must Love Dogs” is implicit.

Or animals, at least. The Humane Society University, newly licensed as a degree-granting institution by the District of Columbia, will begin offering undergraduate degrees this fall in animal studies, animal policy and advocacy, and humane leadership, as well as graduate certificates in those three areas. The university, which is a program of the Humane Society of the United States, will offer degree programs online and on site in D.C.

The programs are oriented toward working adults and those looking to complete their bachelor’s degrees; to be admitted to the undergraduate programs, students would essentially have to have junior status, and have already completed at least 60 college credits, including general education requirements, elsewhere. (Another such specialized college offering instruction only in the junior and senior years, but this one with a single major in history, is also getting started.)

“In the animal shelter community, a great percentage of executive directors are career changers. And the executive directors at the local animal shelter level, a great majority of them do not have a college degree or only have an associate degree. So this is really trying to help professionalize that position,” says Robert Roop, the Humane Society University’s president. In addition to professionals already working in animal shelters or related nonprofits, the university hopes to attract students interested in animals and animal advocacy more generally -- “someone who works in the day and volunteers in the evening, or someone who works in public policy who has a keen interest in animal advocacy,” Roop says.

"We really think there is a niche out there."

The Humane Society University already offers non-credit professional or work force development courses in-person and online, and has since its founding about five years ago, Roop explains. Now that it’s licensed to grant degrees, Roop says the university has plans to seek accreditation from the Middle States Commission on Higher Education.

So what would a major in animal studies, animal policy and advocacy, or humane leadership look like? Across the three majors, all students would take two courses: Animal Protection as a Social Movement and Animals and Ethics. The animal studies major is intended to be interdisciplinary in nature, and the core courses include Understanding the Human Animal Bond, Sociology of Animal Abuse, Animals in Literature, Global Animal Issues, and Animal Protection and the Environment. Core courses for the animal policy and advocacy major, meanwhile, include Research Methods for Humane Change, Animals and Public Policy, and Animals, Advocacy and Corporate Change. The humane leadership major includes core courses in “humane content," including courses in Humane Education and Animal Cruelty and Interpersonal Violence, as well core courses in nonprofit management.

Tuition will be set at around $300 per credit or $900 per course, says Roop. While the department chairs will be full-time faculty, the university will otherwise rely on adjuncts -- which Roop says offers an opportunity to cull the best available talent to teach in the part-time program. “We have literally gone out and scoured the countryside for what we could consider the expert in animal ethics and the expert in the sociology of animal abuse,” said Roop, who expects that about 60 to 70 percent of the university's students will enroll online. For students, he likewise hopes to draw from a national pool.

“It’s the only program like it in the United States,” says Roop. “There’s nothing even close to compare to it.”

Frankie Trull, president of the National Association for Biomedical Research -- which represents groups that do animal research whereas the Humane Society represents, well, animals -- was skeptical. She pointed out that plenty of colleges already offer degrees in various aspects of animal care (albeit not advocacy, but, she said, “I’ve never heard of a university granting degrees in advocacy”).

She asked: “If the degree really is something of value when you get out, I guess that’s the question. And maybe it is, like everything else that’s new, who knows? Some things work and some things don’t. But I certainly think the message needs to be made that there are programs in existence now in all forms of animal care.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Degree Completion for Dog Lovers

  • great degree area
  • Posted by Pat Moran , Director, Disability Services at Blinn College - Texas on June 19, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • As an academic adviser at a community college in Texas, I am so glad to hear about this program. There are students who desire this type of education, but have only had the options of vet school (many students are not up to the academic rigors), animal science (not a broad enough scope for the work wanted), or vet. tech certificates (not everyone wants to work in a veterinarian's office). I intend to print out this article and do more research with the Humane Society to get information to pass along to students interested in this path (there are many!). As an animal lover and advocate, trainer working with aggressive rescued dogs, and faithful financial contributor to SPCA and Best Friends, I applaud the Humane Society for developing this educational option. Bravo! pat moran

  • Useful degree?
  • Posted by Cherie Rankin , Instructor of English at Heartland Community College on June 19, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • I wouldn't recommend any of my community college students to this program, which is surely just a front (another one) for the HSUS's animal rights agenda. As this article states, there are already solid programs out there for people seeking animal-related degrees, housed in colleges and universities dedicated to presenting multiple viewpoints and making every attempt at objectivity. Anything run or funded by the HSUS will not be an exercise in objectivity or the search for knowledge. It will be an exercise in teaching students the animal rights agenda and political strategies for advancing the same. No thank you.

  • Fantastic
  • Posted by Daniel Hauff at DePaul University on June 19, 2009 at 1:30pm EDT
  • Kudos to the Humane Society (HSUS) for offering a program where students can critically analyze our relationships with animals - be that in law, veterinary medicine, "entertainment," animal agribusiness or another area. No institution of higher education would be able to do this correctly without requiring analysis of all reputable sides of the argument, so I believe that Cherie's comments aren't of concern here. One only needs to look at HSUS' materials to know that they have their finger on the pulse of all industries that use and abuse animals, and I have been reviewing those materials for many years. I have confidence that they would certainly ensure, in fact require, that their students have a deep understanding of the opposition to their mission - those who abuse animals - providing their graduates with a foundation for making positive change in our society and a deep and diverse knowledge base regarding animals. In fact, that is the best way to make a solid argument.

  • H$U$ "animal rights" industry university
  • Posted by Marie Durham , CEO at Aviculture USA on June 19, 2009 at 3:30pm EDT
  • Doesn't it take some stringent requirements to be an accredited university offering a recognized degree? The Humane Society of the U.S. (H$U$) is the leading "animal rights" industry corporation, and any course offerings they would make are biased towards the "animal rights" agenda, NOT true academia. How can anyone with real *common sense* and integrity consider such a fringe group biased agenda. This is NOT about animal welfare or animal protection. This IS about "animal rights" and feeding the behemoth that is the H$U$--trying to control our animals, including our food supply, as well as brainwashing our citizens. Friends don't let friends contribute or assist in any way the H$U$! Check out http://ar-hr.com and the many links to other expose articles about H$U$. Watch the video that H$U$ has tried to censor: http://www.vidoosh.tv/play.php?vid=4360.

  • For Those Who Oppose
  • Posted by Jason Xavier at University of Illinois at Chicago on June 19, 2009 at 5:15pm EDT
  • It saddens me that there are criticisms against a humane organization for doing exactly what its mission states, promoting policies and actions to protect animals, for offering a groundbreaking degree for that mission. My guess is that those in opposition aren't spending as much time blogging about religious institutions who offer higher ed degrees even though their argument should require them to (and would affect my alma matter - a Catholic university with master and doctoral level options), or against for-profit business institutions offering degrees. Please, if you are going to link to articles about dogs and cats and the mission of the Humane Society of the United States, have a look at HSUS' logo! It's not made from dogs and cats - it's made of a bunch of different animals. Pigs, seals, cows, chickens, doves, whales, dogs, cats, raccoons and monkeys are all individual sentient animals who feel pain, joy, fear and pleasure with their own wants, including the desire not to suffer - that's the point exactly!

  • My Degree was in Social Justice - Hooray for More of It!
  • Posted by Sasha Marie on June 19, 2009 at 5:15pm EDT
  • My undergraduate degree came from a religious university and the focus, although in International Relations, was on social justice. I think it would have been great to have had a better concentration on advocacy in social justice issues such as this one being offered in relation to animals by the Humane Society versus the hodge-podge group of classes and ton of independent studies that I had to do, without true faculty focus and support on the topics of my interest that other students got when they majored in say marketing or history, that such a program as the Humane Society's will offer. This is groundbreaking in the very young area of Humane Education.

  • Well Said, Jason
  • Posted by Chris McNeal at Kent State University on June 19, 2009 at 9:00pm EDT
  • We obviously need people working for animals if people are going to be so opposed to a degree that would teach people exactly how to do that. HSUS works on behalf of animals - pure and simple. That includes, Ms. Rankin and Ms. Durham, more than dogs and cats, or even horses. Extend your circle of compassion! As Mr. Xavier said, I do not see any difference between this accredited institution offering higher ed degrees or a religious institution. Are you equally opposed to accredited religious universities? It seems that some others have been the ones "brainswashed." Additionally, does "Aviculture USA" exist? I couldn't find such a company online.

  • Timely
  • Posted by Jen , Assistant Professor of Epizootiology on June 20, 2009 at 6:15am EDT
  • The role of animals is by far one of the hottest topics in society today. We should be welcoming the analysis of such issues in an academic forum. Accreditation will be obtained if it is earned, as is the case with any other degree program. Those resisting such a program can utilize their academic freedom to challenge any unobjective propoganda, as they see fit.

    While this may be the first program concentrating on animal issues and advocacy, it is not the first time academia has addressed these issues. For example, the link between animal abuse and human violence has been well-established in the academic literature for well over two decades.
    The study of animal sentience is a steadily growing field that is changing the way we look at animals and how they are used.

    As with any potential shift in social values we are faced with the keepers of the status quo. However, public opinion indicates a desire to eliminate unnecessary research on animals, and better welfare for food animals. Case in point - California's recent passing of Proposition 2, the Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act.

    These are topics that can no longer be ignored. I think having these issues addressed in academia will encourage both sides to legitimize their arguments and not hide behind mainstream propoganda.

  • agendas?
  • Posted by Jim A at U of Jesusland on June 20, 2009 at 6:15am EDT
  • Why do I get the feeling that the commenters who refer to the "animal rights agenda" are probably also obsessed with the "homosexual agenda"? 

  • Posted by Terry on June 20, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • With the HSUS the largest Animal Rights group in America raking in over a hundred million dollars a year, the majority of which which is NOT spent helping animals, they are the greatest threat to Agriculture, Sportsmen, and Pet Owners in the world. Their agenda is extinction of domestic animals and if you research them, their agenda is obvious. If there is an anti-dog and cat bill in your state, they support it. If there is an anti agriculture bill out there, they support it. Wake up and ask your Farm Bureau or any agriculture entity out there just what the agenda of this dangerous organization is. Having them in education is brilliant on their part and a disaster for all who love their animals whether they are a house pet or a horse, to thoser who eat meat, enjoy going to the zoo or to a rodeo. Graduaates of this school will then be part of the campaign to rid the earth of domestic animals, one step, one law, at a time.

  • Perhaps we can start a bomb making school also?
  • Posted by Lisa , Professor, Animal Science at University of Nebraska on June 20, 2009 at 2:00pm EDT
  • It saddens me that it appears so many fellow colleagues have fallen for the agenda of this organization. I seriously doubt a requirement for this program is that you must love dogs. Afterall, Ingrid Newkirk never met a dog she wouldn't like to kill. It's all documented at Petakillsanimals.com. Don't believe me, go to that site and research it for yourself. And Wayne, "doesn't have a hands on fondness for animals" as he states in Bloodties: Nature, Culture and the Hunt by Ted Kerasote, 1993, p. 251. “I don’t have a hands-on fondness for animals…To this day I don’t feel bonded to any non-human animal. I like them and I pet them and I’m kind to them, but there’s no special bond between me and other animals.” He also wants to take your pets away: When asked if he envisioned a future without pets, “If I had my personal view, perhaps that might take hold. In fact, I don’t want to see another dog or cat born.” Wayne Pacelle quoted in Bloodties: Nature, Culture and the Hunt by Ted Kerasote, 1993, p. 266. He also thinks everyone should eat tofu and bean sprouts instead of meat. Some of the comments above are pretty sad. I would have thought people with an education would have been able to see through this cult and realize the majority of the people who make up the organization are a bunch of fruitloops who are mainly interested in raking in huge sums of money so they can tell everyone else what to do. Not in a million years would I recommend this program to any student of mine....

  • Data Base
  • Posted by DFS on June 20, 2009 at 2:00pm EDT
  • I am all for this kind of effort. We need it.

    However, any website about this which does not have Cesar Milan appear in a search has absolutely no credence with me.

    There must be some agenda, especially when the Board of Trustees includes teaching professors.

    Where is the objective oversight? How is accreditation even possible?

  • Posted by John on June 20, 2009 at 2:30pm EDT
  • Actually if there is legislation or proposed education in your state that is deemed anti dog, HSUS not only supported it but WROTE it. Since they do not own a single shelter, they cannot provide for any animals that they confiscate. How then, does that equate to being able to educate others on animal care, animal husbandry?

  • The dog whisperer...are you serious?
  • Posted by Jen on June 20, 2009 at 9:45pm EDT
  • Please don't rely on Cesar Millan for your information regarding animal issues. His one-size-fits-all approach to dog training is irresponsible. Credible animal behaviourists understand this.

    While the end-goal of organizations such as PETA and HSUS may be to eliminate any use of animals, there is no doubt that they have succeeded in improving animal welfare across the board - results that the mainstream public find reassuring. For example, PETA has done more to promote spay/neuter and raise the issue of pet overpopulation than any other organization.

    The fact is, animal welfare laws are archaic and need an overhaul. It may take "extreme" groups to raise awareness of these issues. The world is not black and white. If you have a stake in the issue, better to get involved and gain some control then to let others dictate what happens and then sit back and complain.

    By the way, I love a good steak and I can't imagine life without a pet. I have not hopped on the HSUS band-wagon nor "fallen" for any agenda. I believe there are ways to make life better for all species on the planet without it being an "all-or-nothing" approach.

  • Re: Agendas
  • Posted by AR-HR.com on June 21, 2009 at 3:00pm EDT
  • "Why do I get the feeling that the commenters who refer to the "animal rights agenda" are probably also obsessed with the "homosexual agenda"?"

    As the author of the articles referenced above, I can say definitively that this is certainly not the case. The people being adversely affected by Animal Rights Industry efforts transcend this narrow definition, as do many (if not most) standing against entrenching this philosophical agenda in legislation. This organization has already been involved in the development of academically suspect literature. An example is funding of papers concerned with defining 'animal hoarding' as a mental illness, primarily written by veterinarians instead of psychiatrists/psychologists/doctors and members of the funding organization.

    Please consider reading some of the writing I have done at http://AR-HR.com then feel free to make up your own mind on the validity of their philosophy and activities. I do make every effort to provide supporting documentation to allow readers to look into the issues for themselves.

    Erica Saunders, AR-HR.com Founder

  • Yes, I am serious
  • Posted by DFS on June 21, 2009 at 3:00pm EDT
  • Pro or Con, his name should have lit up a few searches from their website. (Can we even discuss the real issues anymore in academia?)

    The complete absence of Mr. Milan there speaks volumes about its so-called scholarship.

    By the way, scholarship aside, his constant disclaimers referring viewers to (other) professionals, along with his acknowledgements that his spoken philosophy is not guaranteed to work with every animal, should prepare you to understand dogs better.

    Unless you've already made up your mind, as it does appear here.

  • How about a decent dialog here?
  • Posted by Cherie Rankin , Instructor of English at Heartland Community College on June 21, 2009 at 3:45pm EDT
  • I posted my earlier comments because I have serious reservations about giving the HSUS this kind of platform in the guise of education. Responders have since insinuated that I "hate" animals, that I might be "obsessed" with the "homosexual agenda," that my "obsession" might be better spent elsewhere, and that I need to "expand my circle of compassion."

    First of all, I attended a religious institution for undegrad, and I don't have a problem with religious institutions--if they practice intellectual rigor and broadmindedness.

    Second, I do think that corporations and educational institutions climbing into bed together IS problematic, on a number of levels, but that's not the issue here. The issue here is HSUS and a major university climbing into bed together, and that's a problem, as I see it.

    As far as the "homosexual agenda" goes, I assure you I am in full support of GLBT people being given full civil rights. Jim A., how about a decent argument instead of insinuating that people who don't fall for the HSUS and the animal rights rhetoric are close-minded bigots?

    I don't have a problem with educational programs for people who want to work in the animal WELFARE movement. Animals do need us to be stewards for them and provide protection from cruelty and abuse. I don't believe that the HSUS can provide these programs, because animal welfare is NOT their goal.

    As far as expanding my circle of compassion, I realize that the animal world expands beyond dogs and cats. I know that we can do much environmentally, and to clean up factory farming. I grew up on a family farm where the animals spent most of their lives pretty much free range, and they were cared for quite well. I am a meat eater, but the meat I eat was raised on a farm much like that, not bought from a factory farm through a chain store. I have owned four rescued dogs. I work with an all-breed rescue. I also own a purebred dog, and hope to own another someday. There is a place for both in the world, but there won't be a place for EITHER if the HSUS eventually has its way. I'm sick and tired of the HSUS writing correspondence through my state legislators' offices and pretending to be a non-political "charity" organization, and using their considerable lobbying power to ram through animal rights legislation, much of aimed at dog breeders.

  • Good on you, Cherie
  • Posted by DFS on June 21, 2009 at 8:15pm EDT
  • You're right.

    This is a brand-new effort. I really want it to succeed. Even though I'm a mathematician, I would consider this as a twilight occupation for my life.

    But I have trepidations about the impetus here. And this just sucks, now, because we all mostly feel leary now about anything when such political heavyweights such as PETA or HSUSA,et. al., having to chime in.

  • Defining progress
  • Posted by Khalif Williams , Executive Director at Institute for Humane Education on June 22, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • I work for an organization that provides an M.Ed. degree program in humane education (education about interconnected, global, ethical issues including animal protection). We've been doing it since 2000. The comments on this thread are all a part of the serious discussion that important issues like animal protection deserve, which is wonderful.

    But I'm afraid potential allies in creating real solutions to entrenched cruel or destructive systems like factory farming, who's effects bleed out far beyond their immediate environment and the suffering of the animals confined inside, are not recognizing one another.

    In the end, it will be more important for us all to dig deeply into where and why suffering, exploitation, and oppression exists for people, the environment, and animals and seek to understand ALL the forces and interconnections at play. We should be very concerned with understanding the systems that perpetuate it all and with facing our own accountability. Then we can reach for some solutions that work for everyone.

    If we continue to merely dissect statements, for or against a fuzzy platform, from specific people or analyze and attempt to discredit the agendas of specific organizations and movements (each made up of countless agendas) I think we'll be missing the opportunity we have to try to create a world with less suffering, exploitation, and oppression.

    This is an "agenda" I bet we could all rally around and one worthy of serious pursuit in education at all levels.

  • You're right, Khalif
  • Posted by DFS on June 23, 2009 at 2:45pm EDT
  • And I officially apologize for my comments, inasmuch mayas they pertain to not working together.

    I really do want this kind of effort to succeed.

  • please clarify comments
  • Posted by andy on July 9, 2009 at 12:30pm EDT
  • Cherie and Khalif, please clarify your comments (following). I am fairly new to this world of animal welfare, and truly want the best for the animals. Thank you.

    Cherie said:
    I don't have a problem with educational programs for people who want to work in the animal WELFARE movement. Animals do need us to be stewards for them and provide protection from cruelty and abuse. I don't believe that the HSUS can provide these programs, because animal welfare is NOT their goal.

    Cherie - what do you mean by "animal welfare is NOT their goal?"

    ALSO for Khalif Williams , Executive Director at Institute for Humane Education on June 22, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
    "I work for an organization that provides an M.Ed. degree program in humane education (education about interconnected, global, ethical issues including animal protection). We've been doing it since 2000."

    Please provide contact info/website for your institute and these courses - I've looked everywhere for months and months and can't find what HSUS seems to be offering - thanks!