News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Oct. 28
TAMPA — The session on mentoring minority doctoral students was proceeding swimmingly enough, as the panelists offered useful tips about how the traditional methods for guiding graduate students work (and don’t) for students of color, earning the kind of head-nodding agreement that is typical at gatherings of like-minded people. That all changed when one of the presenters, Javier Cuevas of the University of South Florida, said that he had changed his mind in recent years about one key question.
“I used to think that you didn’t have to have a close relationship with the student to be a mentor,” Cuevas, an associate professor of molecular pharmacology and physiology at South Florida’s College of Medicine, said at the session at the Compact for Faculty Diversity’s Institute on Teaching and Mentoring here. “But I’ve come to believe that there’s a huge difference between an adviser, who may only be concerned about the student’s performance on a particular project, and someone who has truly taken on the role of mentor. To me, friendship is an essential component of being a true mentor.”
The notion that a faculty mentor must — or at least should — be a friend to a graduate student or junior professor to be effective provoked intense debate among the several dozen academics in the room. “I agree that an emotional connection, a level of caring, is an essential component of being a mentor,” said Alvin Fox, a professor of microbiology at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine and director of the medical school’s Sloan Minority Ph.D. Program. “But friendship is not the correct term. I think it says something beyond that.”
The discussion that unfolded over the next hour suggested that the scholars were divided more by rhetoric, perhaps, than by greatly diverging perceptions of what makes a mentor effective — and where the boundaries are between caring and friendship.
The philosophical question, “friend or no,” emerged from what was otherwise mostly a nuts and bolts discussion about effective mentorships, in which Arizona State University’s Carlos Castillo-Chavez discussed efforts there and elsewhere to encourage minority students to become mathematical scientists, and Gilbert John described Oklahoma State University’s outreach to Native American graduate students.
When it was Cuevas’s turn, he quickly made it clear that he was most interested in talking about what qualified as good mentoring, regardless of who was being mentored. “Whether one is African American, Hispanic, or Caucasian, good mentoring will help a student get through the program,” he said.
His definition of “good mentoring,” Cuevas said, required a faculty member working with a doctoral student or junior faculty member on two separate but complementary levels: first, professional and career development ("What does it take to be a pharmacy professor, a math professor? Giving them an understanding of the culture") and second, psychological and emotional support, especially for those who don’t have a background in higher education and may be unprepared (or underprepared) to adjust to the lifestyle of a professor.
“Some mentors can’t provide both of those components, and so a person might need one mentor for one aspect of their career, and a different mentor for the other,” Cuevas said. But for those to whom he is a mentor, he said, “I think that providing that psychological and emotional support is a key component.” The difference between a true mentor and an adviser who is a mere “supervisor” is that the latter “may not mind if you take 10 years to get through the program,” Cuevas said. A mentor who cares about a student, he said, is “going to do what I can do in the rest of my life to make sure that the student moves through his or her career successfully.”
Fox, the South Carolina professor, said he agreed that “emotional involvement” was important for a mentor, because “if you’ve got no soul, no heart, all you are is a supervisor.” But “friendship,” he said in an interview after the session, involves a “liking” that he said was not necessarily part of the mentor-mentee relationship.
Another professor in the audience, who asked not to be identified, went further. “My concern about this ‘friend’ thing,” he said, is that some graduate students “come in with psychological problems that you have nothing to do with,” and the more an instructor got involved in their personal lives, the more entangling it could be. “I found it helpful to keep as much distance between this and you as you possibly can,” he said.
“Those personal issues are outside of what we’re supposed to be doing,” Cuevas agreed. He clarified that his definition of “friendship” did not entail the sort of personal entanglements the others seemed to envision. “Of course there have to be certain boundaries; you can’t have a relationship where there are no barriers, because if there aren’t, that person may not look at you as a person who can provide guidance,” he said.
Asked afterward to explain what the boundaries are, Cuevas said that he has “dinner parties at my house,” but he makes it a point to ensure that the graduate students he works with “don’t know what’s happening in my personal life.” A reporter asked whether “friendship” leads to involvement in a student’s personal issues. Cuevas paused and thought. “There’s a single parent in my lab who is struggling to get out of the lab on time,” he said. “I tend to think it’s okay for me to maybe offer some solutions, like finding closer day care, so in that way I do become involved in the personal life.”
But Cuevas would not, he said, try to advise one of the students he works with about how to handle a destructive personal relationship, because he has no expertise in that role. “My answer there has to be, ‘I can’t help you,’ and then direct them to the right person.”
He added: “I do think you can be friends as a mentor. But you can be friends with somebody without being that person you hang out and have a beer with.”
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
The attendees should be exploring the difference between and intersection of Aristotle’s Dyiadic (personal) and Civic (political) friendship (Aristotle. (1980). “The Nichomachean ethics” (D. Ross, trans.) Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press). There’s a great article in the Fall 2005 NACADA (National Academic Advising Association) Journal entitle “Academic Advising As Friendship,” The article is a fast read that really brings to light the importance of the advisor/advisee—or in this case mentor/mentee—relationship.
Art Esposito, Director, Academic Advising at Virginia, at 9:25 am EDT on October 28, 2008
Mentoring and counseling are the greatest responsibility for mentor and counselor. I think study for Master or Doctorate Degrees are very tough in developing countries because of shortage of Professors with Ph.D. Lack of Professors to take the roles both teaching and mentoring their student for conducting theses/Dissertations of graduate students. Lot of Ph.D students are dismissed because of mentoring interactions and devotion of mentors, because of multi-tasks and limitation of times for outstanding Professors. The poorest situation in manydeveloping countries which need quality improvement for post-secondary education.
Kampechara Puriparinya, Mentoring and Counseling at TSU, at 10:20 am EDT on October 28, 2008
There is no doubt that compassion for fellow human beings is an essential characteristic of successful mentors. Friendship implies reciprocity of emotions. This is not possible in any teacher-student relationship because there is a power differential. The best mentors are acutely aware of the power and influence they wield and take care lest they abuse the privilege.
Elaine Hogan, Academic advisor at UNCW, at 11:05 am EDT on October 28, 2008
Very interesting article. I particularly think that a session on mentoring doctoral students would be very beneficial to mentors as well as the current and impending mentees. I understand the discussions’ participants’ tendency to get caught up in the semantics of defining “friendship” and what constitutes “personal.” For example, a mentor responding to the mentee’s questions relating to how they approached job searches and interviewing can disclose personal information or at least professional-personal information.
From the viewpoint of a recently graduated doctoral student with a stellar mentor currently transitioning from professor-mentor to colleague-mentor, I think the “caring” may best be explained by the rapport built between the two. Rapport relates to the interaction and connection that can be made between people and does not necessarily mean you “like someone personally” as in “friendship.” Rapport is two-sided. When the mentor and mentee both “care” and “give,” the winning combination creates and maintains a true mentor/mentee relationship.
Robin Capt, Assistant Professor at West Texas A&M, at 1:05 pm EDT on October 28, 2008
Of course teachers and students should be friends, for heaven’s sake. If they are not, then little in the way of serious teaching can go on — only the conveying of information.
Michael Buckley is one of a number of authors who argue for “Restoring the interpersonal in higher education” and escaping from the industrial model of university organization that has been in place for a hundred years:
http://collegiateway.org/news/2007-newman-buckley
Buckley quotes Newman:
“I say then, that the personal influence of the teacher is able in some sort to dispense with an academical system [that is, a bureaucratic institution], but that the system cannot in any sort dispense with personal influence. With influence there is life, without it there is none; if influence is deprived of its due position, it will not by those means be got rid of, it will only break out irregularly, dangerously. An academical system without the personal influence of teachers upon pupils is an arctic winter; it will create an ice-bound, petrified, cast-iron University, and nothing else.”
Further items on looking after the well-being of students:
http://collegiateway.org/news/category/pastoral-care
RJO, at 3:05 pm EDT on October 28, 2008
My colleagues in the lab and I frequently have discussions on the topic of mentoring. We have learnt that it is rather unfortunate that “mentoring” is not part of the job description for being a “PI". Therefore, many PIs go about their role as a boss who asks for data to get papers (mutually beneficial) and eventually get grants. This is through no fault of the PI, who enters this stressful job thinking that if he can’t fund his lab...bye-bye research...bye-bye tenure. However, why is it not made clear that the MAIN role of a PI is academics, that is, the students? There are some aspects of friendship that resemble what a good mentor is: (1) takes interest in career prospects and development, (2) MAY provide somewhat personal guidance (ie, managing family life around career) if the relationship has progressed to such a level, and (3) the occassional pat-on-back or “hang in there” or “good job” doesn’t hurt either. In return, the student tends to be more productive after the occassional confidence boost and a sense of being in a supportive environment. The only thing remaining is making this a part of the job description of PI/mentor...which may rely on holding PIs accountable if they do not follow through.
PLR
PLR, at 3:55 pm EDT on October 28, 2008
The conditions that PLR describes are common. Graduate students are often the most shabbily treated group on any campus. To find really good models for the support of graduate student welfare you have to look outside the United States to places like Abbey College at Otago, Woolf College at Kent, and Ustinov College at Durham:
http://collegiateway.org/news/2007-abbey-college-otago
http://collegiateway.org/news/2008-virginia-woolf-college
http://collegiateway.org/news/2007-ustinov-families
RJO, at 7:25 pm EDT on October 28, 2008
As a graduate student in the middle of working on my thesis with my mentor, I found this article fascinating. I have been the beneficiary of a most wonderful mentoring relationship with my professor. He has been caring and yet professional. What makes our relationship work is a clear set of boundaries like the ones described here in by Dr. Cuevas. The most important thing we share is the love of subject matter—poetry in this case. Discussions focus on the aspects of poetic techniques, teaching strategies, ect. But the most essential thing to his mentoring is the fact that he never makes me feel that my questions are silly and encourages my fervor for the subject. Because of working with him, I have developed a passion for my subject and read 50 books as opposed to the twenty to thirty required. If students see the passion a mentor has for their area, it will permeate the student-mentor relationship and offer inspiration to the student. My mentor has been encouraging and kind and I want to be that way with my students. I want them to know that I fiercely believe in their abilities because that is the heart of everything in the mentor-student dynamic.
HAS, National University, at 6:20 am EDT on October 29, 2008
I think it interesting that a person could come down on the “friend” side of this debate while also asserting the need to keep “personal entanglements” out of the relationship. After all, isn’t this level of personal involvement the key to differentiating between the two terms? If we insist upon boundaries that exclude personal problems, then it is clear we should forgo the term “friend” and settle on “mentor.”
Ed, Asst. Prof. at JU, at 8:55 am EST on November 5, 2008
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
All applicants must apply online at: www.ccacjobs.com. The College’s online application system will allow you to complete a ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
All applicants must apply online at: www.ccacjobs.com. The College’s online application system will allow you to complete a ... see job
Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job
Saint Louis University is a Jesuit Catholic University. Through teaching, research, health care and community service, Saint ... see job
Adjunct Online Faculty: English • Nutrition • Psychology • Speech Communication Mathematics • Humanities • ... see job
Position Summary: Assistant Professor in Demography and Public Affairs The Woodrow Wilson School of Public ... see job
Join the Pack! A community with nearly 8,000 faculty and staff, and 30,000 students. NC State is one of the largest employers ... see job
Mentoring in the Academy
If we keep in mind that “Mentor” comes from the name of Odysseus’ “trusted” counselor then we’re aware that trust isn’t assigned but earned. We tend to assign mentors (which at the beginning are likely “advisors”), but at some point, like in the medieval selection of master teachers, mentor and mentee should be by mutual consent. That’s likely the most difficult of the logistics of such programs. It appears that Dr. Cuevas has an intangible that millennial students and younger faculty endorse—compassion. See Tim Sanders’ “Love Is the Killer App: How to win business and influence friends” (Random House, 2002) for his discussion of the three key intangibles (knowledge, networking and compassion). My summary is at: http://www.indwes.edu/jp/AfterBuckCreek/article3.pdf. For a more academic treatment on mentoring see Donald Wulff’s helpful little “Aligning for Learning: Strategies for Teaching Effectiveness (esp. the chapter by Lenz and Lange, “Aligning in the Mentoring Partnership” [Anker, 2005]). We spent considerable time here at IWU yesterday in planning for the mentoring of our Postdoctoral Teaching Fellows via a Senior Scholar approach. Any materials others might suggest here would be appreciated as well. Thanks Doug for an intersting read.
Jerry Pattengale, Ass’t Provost for Scholarship & Public Engagement at Indiana Wesleyan University, at 9:00 am EDT on October 28, 2008