Search Career Advice


Browse Archives

Career Advice

Leaving Academia

11 Things to Know

June 24, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

I’ve been working on the Leaving Academia project, on and off, for three years now. And there are 11 things that I absolutely know are true about leaving academia. They are:

1. You can do it. You can leave academia and survive. You can leave academia and THRIVE, in fact.

2. It is incredibly scary. Figuring out what to do in your post-academic life can feel like one giant question mark pressing down on you with a weight similar to that of writing a dissertation; with enough time, though, and enough self-reflection, you will figure out what you want to do.

3. Your whole life won't come tumbling down into shambles if you leave.

4. You have tons of options for your post-academic career (even though it may not feel that way), many of which have nothing to do with your area of study, but have everything to do with your core skills (e.g. project management, policy analysis, consulting, organizing).

5. You are not crazy if you want to have a satisfying job in a city you actually like and to have your partner and family living with you and to live near your friends.

6. You might not switch immediately into your dream job right away but you will get to your dream job a hell of a lot more quickly if you bail from academia now rather than never (in fact, in my case, I didn't want to jump into a challenging dream job; first, I wanted to just take an intellectual break with an easy job that had solid pay and fab benefits). It might take a few years for you to select the organization that you really care about and climb your way into the job of your dreams. However, just because you might start out closer to the bottom than you would like isn't reason enough to stay in a career stream that might not ever offer you any satisfaction at all.

7. If academia WAS your dream job but you're tired of living in the adjuncting/contract teaching trenches, there are other options for you to use your passion for teaching/learning, your communications skills, your love of reading and your skills at writing and researching. Remember, people -- this is the knowledge and information economy we are living in. A.B.D.’s and Ph.D.’s hold enormous currency in this era.

8. One really big secret: most people outside higher ed don't give a shit if you leave academia, so don't bother feeling guilt about leaving. Sure, some people like your grad supervisor or your faculty chair might be disappointed. But are you really going to make yourself responsible for their feelings, while totally denying yours? Come on. Leave that parent-child dynamic back in your family of origin where it belongs.

9. One other really big secret: a lot of people will actually be jealous of you if you leave academia. Sure, their jealousy might come out in the guise of contempt and guilt-making (oooh, if only I could name names and point fingers, here!). But just like the boy who is cruel to the girl he has a crush on, those unhappy people who try to rain on your bold career change have their own problems to sort out. Don't make their problem your problem.

10. I also want to challenge the idea that once you leave academia, you can never go back. I have heard of a handful of examples of people returning to academia, either decades later as they channel their post-academic professional successes into academic work or as they return simply as adjunct/contract faculty. The sands of academia are shifting and my hunch is that the re-formulation of universities into job farms and knowledge-provision centers, and with the increase of private money (oops, I mean "partnerships") into universities, that the door does not slam shut as firmly as it used to.

11. The other really, really big secret: You deserve better than the life you may be having and the treatment you may be getting in your grad school career. Grad school and adjunct teaching can suck out your soul; being on the tenure track can be fraught with fear as you wonder if this is what you really want to do, and if you want to do it in the city you've ended up in. You don't have to put up with it any more. You have all the skills and resources you need to plan out a realistic, do-able career change. Just look at some of the people who have done just that: Buffy Sainte-Marie (Ph.D. Fine Art, University of Masschusetts), Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales (A.B.D. Finance, University of Alabama), Bust magazine founder Debbie Stoller (Ph.D. English, Yale), and the hottest one of all: the incredible Miuccia Prada has a Ph.D. in political science. Miuccia Prada! If that doesn't serve as inspiration for becoming satisfied and successful in life beyond academe, I don't know what does.

Is there anything I've missed? What would you like to add to this list?

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on 11 Things to Know

  • Leaving Academia and Why I Teach
  • Posted by jerry pattengale , Assistant Provost for Scholarship & Public Engagement at Indiana Wesleyan University on June 24, 2009 at 8:00am EDT
  • Sabine,

    Thanks for a perspective that is often overlooked in Academia, one reflective of external eyes. I've been there, done that, and captured the journey in Why I Teach (McGraw-Hill, 2009). For me, it took leaving (and landing a wonderful CEO position in a foundation) to realize that teaching actually was my dream job, so I returned. Part of Why I Teach that was edited out was a list of ten signs that it's time to leave any job. I'll send these to your email, as they seem to hit some of the same issues you touch on in your other works (which I find interesting and refreshingly candid). The bottom line for me, and from years of research, is making purpose-guided decisions. Your point #5 hints at that, and I've had friends do just that--and loved it. Point #7 is especially true, as the knowledge economy is friendly to our profiles. And, point #8 is likely true of most jobs and the outside. However, I think point #10 might be a bit of a stretch, as I know of many strong professionals who cannot get back into the academy full time--even before the big downturn. The "better life" you discuss in point #11 is central to why anyone would choose to leave, and I'd suggest that it's a personal definition tied to one's fulfillment and sense of life purpose. Parker Palmer helped me with the little book noted above (56 pp.), and I resonate with something he wrote for it: ". . . I teach because I can't not teach. I teach because it is the only way I know to be myself in the world." I'd also recommend Tim Sanders little gem, "Love is the killer app," a book about the three intangibles the younger generation is looking for in the workplace, and ones that provoke us to think through our own choices. Once again, thanks for your writing in this area. JP

  • Better life in many ways
  • Posted by JB Lee , President at JBL Associates on June 24, 2009 at 10:15am EDT
  • I left a tenured teaching job in the SF Bay Area many years ago to work in consulting. I find working in private industry has many advantages. One, it forces you to work on issues that you would have not chosen for yourself, but help you to grow. Two, teamwork is more the norm in business than in academia. The vaunted collegiality is better realized in consulting where we all succeed together or fail together. Academics tend to work alone and complain about administration. Three, you can see the results of your work. Things change as a result of your efforts.

    You do lose things such as autonomy to pursue your interests, the cultural world that you live in more directly on a college campus, and the students that you see come alive in your class. I would rather forget those students who passed through my classes without much commitment or interest.

  • One more example... Jack Welch
  • Posted by Avid , Instructor/Management at Public on June 24, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • PhD Chemical Engineering I believe.... Google founders ABD?

  • Posted by Janice Hansel on June 24, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • Some of the best professors I have had came from industry (in my MBA program) or from administrative positions (in my Ph.D. Education Policy program). I have found it to be very helpful to have both practical experience and theoretical experience. I agree it is hard on "career advancement" to hop back and forth between academia and practice, but it certainly improves one's ability to think clearly about issues and change.

  • Acadmy and corporation
  • Posted by George T. Karnezis on June 24, 2009 at 3:00pm EDT
  • Could it be that academic life has become more "corporate" and life in (at least) the more attractive corporations has become more (in the best sense of the term) academic?

  • where can I find me....
  • Posted by Kelly Besecke on June 24, 2009 at 6:00pm EDT
  • Great article, thank you! I've bookmarked it to get me all invigorated as I continue my leaving-academia process. In the midst of feeling all confirmed and inspired, I was struck with the desire to ask how you chanced upon that initial "easy job that had solid pay and fab benefits." Sounds great! Was it really so much easier to find than the "challenging dream jobs" that seem to be the rage with the kids these days? (And seriously, isn't there something wrong when people's dreams are of challenging jobs rather than fulfilling lives?)

  • Posted by Hot Sexy Prof. on June 24, 2009 at 7:30pm EDT
  • Reason 12: Chances are the profession you're jumping ship to doesn't have it's own online ratings site where vengeful illiterate adolescents take revenge for their low grades in mispelled agrammatical sentences. On second thought, aren't professors the only ones that are open to Google-able public slander, libelous accusations of prejudice, and "hotness" ratings on a website that trivializes and sexualizes their workplace (while generating ad revenues for its corporate owner MTV)?

  • Thanks, and yes!
  • Posted by Sabine on June 24, 2009 at 8:15pm EDT
  • Jerry--yes, I'd love to read your "Top 10 signs you should leave any job." Please pass it on to me. I've also got your book on my "to read" list. I'm still trying to gather the "anecdata" on people returning to academia after leaving. So far I have interviewed one person who returned to teaching via a university in Dubai. Of course, that may not work for everyone (though wasn't it a piece in IHE recently that said universities in India were inundated with North American applicants?). Thanks for your insights about the column.

    Avid--I'll be adding Jack Welch to my "Top 8 Most Famous Academic Leavers" list over at leavingacademia.com. Thanks!

    Kelly--My "easy job with solid pay and fab benefits" was procured through the magic power of...networking. I knew someone who worked at the broadcaster where I applied--she gave me her boss' name, she liked me, and then I squeezed through the HR interview. In my case, yes, it was easier than finding the "challenging dream job" because when I left, I was so incredibly burnt out that I probably had little sense of what my dream job was, let alone how to go about getting it. I never would have imagined that doing the work I do now would turn out to be such a dream.

    Hot Sexy Prof--I second that!

  • Rachel Maddow, PhD in Political Science
  • Posted by Chris Boese , Information Architect on June 24, 2009 at 10:15pm EDT
  • I'm just saying... from Rhodes Scholar to yard boy to "Morning Zoo" DJ... this too can be your life outside of academia!

    Come out, come out, the water's fine!

  • Ditto - industry experience very relevant for Bus. Admin.
  • Posted by Jerry , Prof/Biz at Public on June 25, 2009 at 5:15am EDT
  • Echo earlier sentiments that the best professors - atleast in Business disciplines - seem to be those who have had industry experience. Nothing worse than sitting through an MBA class with a pure academic who has no concept of more practical issues...

  • Posted by WTF on June 25, 2009 at 5:15am EDT
  • Yet again, some good advice, but...

    I left academia about 2 years ago (not really my choice since it came about because I was unable to line up 4 adjunct gigs to pay my bills in a very expensive city).

    I tried shopping myself around town, got one nibble that never panned out, and then was forced to move home WITH MY PARENTS because I was unemployed.

    Then the economy popped and people were getting laid off right and left.

    I haven't had a single job nibble in a year and a half. No one thinks my previous experience, "[my] passion for teaching/learning, [my] communications skills, [my] love of reading and [my] skills at writing and researching" provided the "project management, policy analysis, consulting, organizing" skills (as quite Hikel) that I know I have.

    Is this really the best time to be encouraging people to jump ship? Especially when so many people outside of academia do not respect what we do (which is the real reason they could care less that we've left).

    Sorry to be a Debbie Downer, but these "You can do it!" columns really do not always parse with reality. They seem to never parse with mine.

  • Best perk
  • Posted by Weekend Warrior on June 25, 2009 at 5:15am EDT
  • Your work is done when you leave work. On weekends, time spent playing or resting isn't time stolen from writing you should be doing. You don't have in-process articles around as a ball and chain. That's freeing.

    I went from grad school to a non-academic job. 8 years later got back into academia with a tenure track job. I had a lifetime's worth of research ideas from having been out in the world that I would never have had just reading books, and even when I start new research topics now it is based in that experience. So that worked out ok. Two major downsides to planning on leaving with possibility of coming back. I was very lucky and it was very hard to get back onto an academic track (at a lower level than my grad school peers too). I was surprised, but I think about 5% of people who decide to do it could come back in and get a TT job. Another downside is that as far as academic careers go, I have too few publications for my age and I'm not in the top tier publication inner circle, but that doesn't feel like a big deal (on the other hand, I am much more effective in professional societies and in making things happen at the university than I would have been without non-academic experience).

    Good luck to all.

  • Posted by Sabine on June 25, 2009 at 6:45am EDT
  • Hi, WTF. There are indeed some very real economic realities that underlie a decision to make a career change. People have to face those economic realities in varying degrees, depending on whether they leave academia with a non-academic job already lined up first, or leap without a safety net in place or, in the case of so many contract/adjunct teachers like yourself, are pushed out of the ivory tower. In many instances, there is a harsh transition period when relying on parents, partners and credit cards is the only way to survive.

    Part of the work that I do is interviewing former academics who've found themselves in non-academic careers in order to find out how they managed to get through what can be a very painful transition period between careers. The task of conveying all of those skills that I mentioned to non-academic employers can be very, very difficult. When you leave academia, you're leaving one very intense learning environment and entering another sort of learning environment: one where you have to figure out how to speak the local language of whatever business, foundation, think tank or organization to which you're applying. That's one of the main ways to get them to see the skills that you have as a Ph.D.

    Regarding your question, "Is this really the best time to be encouraging people to jump ship?" I have two thoughts. One is that right now, more and more graduate students need and want to be considering their non-academic career options in case universities don't head out of the tailspin they're in at the moment. I help graduate students do that. The other thought is certainly open to charges of Pollyanna-ism, but I actually do believe that if you're miserable in academia, you have the right (and perhaps a duty to those people around you) to explore other avenues. There is something about academia that makes people feel trapped, and what I do is let people know that that is not necessarily the case--yes, even in a recession.

    Finally, I'm not sure I agree that many people outside of academia don't respect what academics do--but I do know that non-academics mostly don't understand what academics do (which kinda makes sense. I might be able to drive a car but I sure as hell don't know what goes on inside the shop). That's why it's the job of the academic to explain that as plainly as possible when going on the non-academic job market. It's difficult to do this, but it can be done.

  • k-12 and Information
  • Posted by Will Braynen , ABD/Philosophy at Univeristy of Arizona on June 26, 2009 at 8:45pm EDT
  • Dear WTF, why not teach k-12, if you like teaching of course? You'd have to find a good public/ charter/ or private school of course, but, at least public school teachers are always in demand and the salary, while not much, does allow to live independetly (and has benefits, retirement, etc). And the kids could probably use smart educated teachers (I know I could have). I know you probably would've gone to grad school had you aimed to teach k-12, but still, maybe it's not a bad option (and a way to turn a flaw in the academic system into an improvement in the education system).

    Also, since we live in the information age: there is all this strife about how academia makes so many people miserable (depression stats are off the charts for grad students) and how academia can't employ everyone (b/c there are too many phd programs b/c too many kids want to get a phd and information isn't good, kids are irrationally risk-seeking, and there is no coordination/ regulation to keep numbers low, which means that there are more jobs than job seekers, which drives up time to degree and drives down working conditions and pay and makes people fall behind in retirement benefits by as much as a decade). All that boils down to some stats that show that the Ivory Tower, as an institution, doesn't treat its people very well. And, worse yet, no one will take the responsibility or the initiative to organize and fix the problem, while no prospective English or phil major and no prospective phd student ever thinks "I'm going into an already overcrowded field, which means *if* I succeed and am happy, then I'll push someone else out *at the output*. E.g. if the supply-demand ratio of academic labor changed, so would a lot of the working conditions and incentives to live in unattractive places would go up too; we probably wouldn't even cling to tenure so much then (since the real reason tenure exists is probably not so much to protect our 1st amendment rights, but b/c our job market is awful and, perhaps, b/c it allows universities to pay their stars less than their market value).

    I think it's cool that we are treating the symptoms at the output (e.g. how to leave academia), but is anyone focusing on actually coming up with solutions for fixing underlying causes at the input (either fixing them collectively or informationally)?

  • Posted by nobody really on July 19, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • Thanks for your post. I'll be reading your column with interest from within the fences of academia.

    I'm still very much in the frame of mind that I lack skills for anything else. My field of study (pure mathematics) is very unworldly, and the reason I'm considering leaving is that I'm just not very good at mathematics, so I can't see how that qualifies me for much.

    BTW, Angela Merkel is another post-academic - she did a PhD in physical chemistry - I wonder if she is on your list?

  • Or leave academia but stay in HE?
  • Posted by Indiana , Humanities at --- on August 18, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • One other option (maybe a halfway house?) is to leave your academic post but stay within Higher Education. That's what I did and it seems to be one potentially easy-ish way to get that first job that has 'solid' pay and great benefits. I jumped due to the pressures and uncertainty of academic work in a department, and moved over to staff development - the hours are much more 9-5 and the post is more stable, there is no pressure to do research (although I can if I want), I get to indulge my love for teaching, get decent money and very similar benefits to the academic staff in my institution but with much less pressure. Your PhD is recognised and valued, and there is an understanding of the transferable skills that doing a PhD involves. Even if you don't want to stay in HE, it's a good interim move that helps you to develop more of the transferable skills and qualifications that would help you to get a job elsewhere (if that's what you want!)